G!

[BusaLoco]

[]

[slngsht]

245 ft.lbs is decent on the hartly

 

190 ft.lbs on the RST - well, at least it has enough torque for my lug nuts -- Where are the "Bike Engines" in those pics?

 

(flame suite on)

 

Going out of the Bike section as fast as my clunky car engine will take me :seeya:

[R1 Seven]

245 ft.lbs is decent on the hartly

 

190 ft.lbs on the RST - well, at least it has enough torque for my lug nuts -- Where are the "Bike Engines" in those pics?

 

(flame suite on)

 

Going out of the Bike section as fast as my clunky car engine will take me :seeya:

 

I am finding that 80 ft-lbs is plenty enough to keep the car moving...where is the flame thrower emoticon to use on Mr. flame suit wearer? :jester:

[slngsht]

I have to find those and add them :yesnod: Only for the BEC section

[Birkin42]

Nice engines to drool over but likely a fairly expensive way to get hp, but I guess not too many options if you want light ponies, partictularly normally asperated ones.

Should include the prices on those babies.

[BusaLoco]

Ho"

 

 

 

 

[powderbrake]

You can never have too much hosepower.......................you can however have too little traction.

 

Only $30K for the engine? I'll take the pair, Please equip them with the quick detach coupling so I can swap them in and out to compare them.

[slomove]

Quote:

God But Bike Engines Rule!...Or What?

 

 

I though they ARE bike engines. Well, I mean they WERE bike engines......

[andrew7]

I seen the Hartly at Carlisle its beautiful but I agree with Birkin42 on this one. One thing to consider, what happens when it needs rebuilt or is this a one time use engine? I guess I'm frugal, the R1 was 180 hp for $1800 maybe when it wears out I'll upgrade.

 

Hey Jeff, how much hp can our motors make before jumping up to a turbo? 220 hp with cams and headwork, I was curious.