Manshoon11 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 I am rewriting History now?! WTF? Dang, you must have some good dope :rofl: Umm by acting like you said something else. Duh No YOU were trying to bait the discussion to be about the economic impact. I merely pointed out that I believe that the benefits of doing something outweighs the negatives regardless of whether global warming is true or not. PERIOD! It shouldn't have been that hard to for you to understand had you not been so determined to jump to conclusions and pick a fight over something I didn't say. Right back at you chief I get it. You are not used to being challenged and must maintain your massive ego. You displayed that you thought there WERE NO NEGATIVES, as the worst that would happen would be for jobs and technology to be created. You did not even consider that less total employment and less technology would exist in your fairy tale scenario to add, many great things came out of trying to solve "non problems" Flawless logic MoPho :flag: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoPho Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Umm by acting like you said something else. Duh I get it. You are not used to being challenged and must maintain your massive ego. You displayed that you thought there WERE NO NEGATIVES, as the worst that would happen would be for jobs and technology to be created. You did not even consider that less total employment and less technology would exist in your fairy tale scenario Flawless logic MoPho :banghead: Apparently you don't know how to read between the lines.... when I said it would cost some people money I was referring to the negatives. I am sorry I didn't go into enough detail for you to figure that out, but I was trying to be brief. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manshoon11 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 (edited) :banghead: Apparently you don't know how to read between the lines.... when I said it would cost some people money I was referring to the negatives. I am sorry I didn't go into enough detail for you to figure that out, but I was trying to be brief. . Sorry child, that is not what you said. the worst that happens is some people had to spend money, some new jobs and new technology were created" did you not understand? i.e some would lose money, some would make money (AKA same shit different day) . Like I already said....... "in other words" does not fit. You are trying to say something entirely different. It'd have been fine if you tried to clarify or just said, "sorry, what I meant was______" Some people will always "lose money". If my business grows, it is at the expense of others. Land, labor and capital has to come from somewhere! A true negative is if economic growth is lower than it would be ceteris paribus. The same with total jobs, etc. This is why I asked about what that money would have been spent on otherwise. I was wondering if you had considered that economic growth could be higher if we focused our efforts on solving real problems. You won't succeed in frustrating me. I debate economics for a hobby. Your first grade logic is easy to explode. Edited April 6, 2014 by Manshoon11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee break Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 :lurk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoPho Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 (edited) Sorry child, that is not what you said. Like I already said....... "in other words" does not fit. You are trying to say something entirely different. It'd have been fine if you tried to clarify or just said, "sorry, what I meant was______" Some people will always "lose money". If my business grows, it is at the expense of others. Land, labor and capital has to come from somewhere! A true negative is if economic growth is lower than it would be ceteris paribus. The same with total jobs, etc. This is why I asked about what that money would have been spent on otherwise. I was wondering if you had considered that economic growth could be higher if we focused our efforts on solving real problems. You won't succeed in frustrating me. I debate economics for a hobby. Your first grade logic is easy to explode. Wow, and you accuse me of having a "massive ego".... :rofl: I really don't have the time, nor do I give a shit what you "THINK" I said anymore, I made myself clear, so go tell your friends what a tough guy you are winning an argument on the internet. GOOD JOB! :seeya: Great idea having a politics section Mazda! . Edited April 6, 2014 by MoPho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manshoon11 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Wow, and you accuse me of having a "massive ego".... :rofl: I really don't have the time, nor do I give a shit what you "THINK" I said anymore, I made myself clear, so go tell your friends what a tough guy you are winning an argument on the internet. GOOD JOB! :seeya: Great idea having a politics section Mazda! . What is wrong with winning an argument? Nice talking to ya https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3KCEpzAcCg . . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slngsht Posted April 6, 2014 Author Share Posted April 6, 2014 Great idea having a politics section Mazda! Participation is optional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoPho Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 What is wrong with winning an argument? . . . . yes, you are very impressive , I long to come to your house and bow to your first grade superiority. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoBoost Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Can this thread be locked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slngsht Posted April 6, 2014 Author Share Posted April 6, 2014 yup, 'bout time I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts