Manshoon11

Well yeah, the MSR viper crew are no joke. I was studying viperfergy (kevin ferguson) long before my first track day.

IIRC 1:16 ish If so, the tires don't account for you going down 6 seconds. I think you had the: http://static.wixstatic.com/media/dcdafa_48f143765f1941228713da7623e6b6ce.png_srz_449_308_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_png_srz

'72 SD 455 or bust P.S. Can you please answer the question in this thread for me? http://usa7s.com/vb/showthread.php?p=84000#post84000 Lives may be at stake. :rofl:

I thought it had factory baffling?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Replica-Kit-Makes-Super-Stalker-2-seater-Brunton-Super-Stalker-/131154956138?forcerrptr=true&hash=item1e8971cf6a&item=131154956138&pt=US_Cars_Trucks

Proof that Americans don't suck.

What is wrong with winning an argument? Nice talking to ya https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3KCEpzAcCg . . . . .

Sorry child, that is not what you said. Like I already said....... "in other words" does not fit. You are trying to say something entirely different. It'd have been fine if you tried to clarify or just said, "sorry, what I meant was______" Some people will always "lose money". If my business grows, it is at the expense of others. Land, labor and capital has to come from somewhere! A true negative is if economic growth is lower than it would be ceteris paribus. The same with total jobs, etc. This is why I asked about what that money would have been spent on otherwise. I was wondering if you had considered that economic growth could be higher if we focused our efforts on solving real problems. You won't succeed in frustrating me. I debate economics for a hobby. Your first grade logic is easy to explode.

What was your best recorded lap time?

Umm by acting like you said something else. Duh I get it. You are not used to being challenged and must maintain your massive ego. You displayed that you thought there WERE NO NEGATIVES, as the worst that would happen would be for jobs and technology to be created. You did not even consider that less total employment and less technology would exist in your fairy tale scenario Flawless logic MoPho :flag:

Pathetic attempt to re-write history and a display of complete ignorance of economics. What you originally stated is not analogous to "some would lose money, some would make money " You're so cool. :rofl: If you are talking about this, then I have no such dispute. It shows the free market doing what it does best. I thought it was obvious, but I can clear it up. We were talking about the economic impact of spending money on AGW, even if it "turned out not to be real" Yes, you are hopelessly incapable of looking beyond the seen to what is not seen.

You're a slippery critter. Although, you have now made the distinction between government and "we", noted. Show me how you did not ignore the economic cost on wasting money of a non-problem...

Then don't act like there is no downside to government spending on a non-problem.

What would that money have been used for otherwise? Does money that government doesn't take from you not go to creating jobs and technology, but doing so far more efficiently? If the goal is to clean up the air and environment, then why not have that be the stated goal......... oops http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/our-mission-and-what-we-do already have that stated goal. Further, you ignore the cost to economic development if we were to do enough to slow down the growth in greenhouse gases. We absolutely need to get the science right first. Then it is a debate for economists.

Holy crap.... Flippity floppity

I'm looking for nice seats and all mounting stuff.

You can't be a liar if you say you "I can't recall". - = -

:smilielol5:

"One of us, One of us, Gooble Gobble, Gooble Gobble."

at 45 seconds in the video they shoot him with 6 bullets. You can also see the camera man's rifle shooting the last 3 of those rounds. He is not carrying a bean bag gun now is he..... at 1:15 you can see the actual bean bag gun...... quite a bit different, eh?

I'd just recommend at least knowing what your rights are. Even if you plan on complying with their demands for ID and questions. Many agents of government are not our friends and are only looking to make our day much much worse. Just think about it........ one day they are at home beating their women, and a couple months of police academy and suddenly they are the arbiter of truth.

They can't force you to do anything without probable cause. Sure, they might waste some of your time, but it only can go on if we don't exercise our rights

Thought about doing a mic like this guy?

What........ no mentioning the incredible lap times? Criticism = you are going in too hot and getting pushed wide a fair bit.

Luckily we have cameras everywhere (phones, etc). This is our only ammunition against these animals. Remember, they can't just detain and put you in hand cuffs. They have to brutally beat/kill you. Just ask Kelly Thomas. 5 cops couldn't simply hand cuff and place 1 person in the back of a cop car? http://reason.com/reasontv/2014/02/13/police-shoot-kill-80-year-old So they suspect someone of being a drug distributor and they need to raid your house like Osama's compound in Pakistan?!?!? you may not agree with the legal situation of certain drugs, but can you really agree with the military raids because one chooses to use pot, meth etc instead of alcohol (except in the link the police's suspicions were unfounded) The police's new tactics ESCALATE these confrontations.