Jump to content

JohnCh

Administrators
  • Posts

    3,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JohnCh

  1. Congrats! Definitely join the PCA. Good group and the local chapters typically put on a number of events each year, ranging from track days, to tech sessions, to drives. Also check out Rennlist which is a good online community with plenty of tech advice. -John
  2. I looked at their V8 setup (for a friend, not me...really) and that was much cheaper than I'd seen elsewhere, so I just assumed the same was true for the 4 cylinder. I should have looked more closely. If I am reading Jenvey's price list correctly, it appears their equivalent, but non-tapered set up is just under $1000 (361GBP for the TB, 60GBP for the airhorns, and 48GBP for the fuel rail). Oh well, at least the idea is interesting -John
  3. These folks are the US agent for BigHead Fasteners. If they don't stock the right model, I bet they can get it for you. -John
  4. Very interesting new throttle bodies available in the US. They aren’t the prettiest things, but the concept is interesting and they are (relatively) cheap. -John
  5. I had a 1700 crossflow with a Kent 236 cam, and two 40DCOEs that put out about 115hp. I did a lot of research on increasing the power and had several e-mail exchanges with Roger King in the UK who was considered the top tuner for that engine. He told me that the Kent 246 cam with a 3D ignition system was very drivable and had as much low end torque as a Kent 236 with 2D ignition, but a properly built engine with head work and larger valves was at best ~160hp. Yes, I could tune for more with an even more aggressive cam and with steel internals, but streetability and reliability took hits. I looked into converting the car to fuel injection and the consensus was that although driveability would improve there wouldn’t be much of a hp gain. Feedback on the aluminum head was that it was best viewed as a handling upgrade. It pares off ~18lbs from pretty high up in the chassis which is a good thing. I really loved the crossflow and wanted to keep it – I’ve never heard a 4 cylinder engine that sounds better – but after looking at all my options and factoring in the costs, I decided to go with a Duratec. -John
  6. I am aware of about a dozen, but I have only been able to hook up with half of those folks, and unfortunately very few of them seem to monitor this site. Seattle does have a pretty big car enthusiast community though, and lots of track opportunities if that is your thing. If not, then there are a lot of nice roads for day trips. Feel free to PM me if you want info on the area. -John
  7. When I was researching the alloy head for my crossflow a few years ago, I was told that Pierce Manifolds was the manufacturer. Not sure if that is true, but they do carry it. -John
  8. I'm hoping to plan a drive this spring in the Seattle area. Perhaps we can retrace part of the PNW2007 route over a long weekend? -John
  9. Mike, The picture below is the Lucas inertia starter without solenoid (which normally mounts remotely), and the sketch is the gear reduction starter with solenoid. Do either of these look familiar? http://www.pegasusautoracing.com/Images/L/1141.JPG http://www.rdent.com/images/starter.gif -John
  10. I came across this post on another forum that features several pictures of Se7ens taken a vintage event at the Nürburgring. Most appear to be HKTs from Germany and few have some very interesting design elements. One car even has what appears to be faired in cycle fenders! Not sure I like all the things I’m seeing there, but interesting to look at nonetheless. -John
  11. Do you still have the old inertia starter with the remotely mounted solenoid? If so, then this may be a good time to upgrade to a gear reduction starter. They are pricey, but much lighter and more reliable. I bought mine from Dave Bean, but other Lotus places like RD Enterprises should have them, and I believe Pegasus also carries them. -John
  12. Given that you have a se7en, you should drive a 993 before you pull the trigger. The 996 is faster, roomier, quieter, has much better ergonomics, ventilation, and features, yet the 993 is a more visceral experience that I find more satisfying. The 993 community tends to knock the 996 because of the driving experience (it's often referred to as Lexus-like), while the 996 community tends to knock the 993 as outdated and slower. They are both right ;-) After driving examples of each model I bought the air cooled car and have no regrets. Fell free to PM me if you want info on the 993. -John
  13. I have the Motogadget Classic. I use it strictly as a tach, speedometer, odometer, and for some warning lights, but it is configurable for water and oil temp, oil pressure, etc. The readout for those items (and a few others) appear in the LCD window. It also has a gear indicator for those of you with a sequential shifter (although I glance at it occasionally myself ) A few downsides: - You can only monitor one external sensor reading at a time, which means you need to toggle through screens to see everything. - The contrast on the LCD screen could be better. Consequently it is a little harder to read in some light conditions than the Spa Technique unit it replaced - The speed and odometer readouts are the same size. It would be easier to quickly read the speed if that was the larger of the two. http://www.motogadget.com/de/graphic/msc/msc_0009_300.jpg Over all though, I am very happy with it. Probably not quite what you are looking for, but it might be of interest to others. -John
  14. Kind of like the Brooke Double R? http://www.brookecars.co.uk/images/brooke_sports_car-700.jpg -John
  15. No, don't sell it!! We need more se7ens in the Seattle area! -John
  16. Ah, those photos didn't appear for me when I posted earlier. You weren't kidding when you wrote that you will need an air filter I agree that an ITG or Pipercross is the way to go. Looking at the photo of your carbs, those appear to be backing plates for K&N filters, so that is probably the easiest route, since the hole in the bonnet is probably sized for those items. Not sure if an ITG or Pipercross would fit without additional trimming, but someone on here probably knows the answer. -John
  17. Can you post a pic of the intake? Regarding seats, there are not a lot of options out there that don't break the bank. The one-piece seats like Tillets or Mogs are surprisingly comfortable, but they are also really expensive. There are some small manufacturers making similarly styled seats which are cheaper -- just make sure they are rigid and well made. Another option is the original Westfield Race seats with the optional padding, or their new version. They are a bit on the narrow side, but comfy. Looking at more traditional style seats, I’ve heard good things about the Cobra Roadster 7, but I’m not sure if they will fit in a Birkin. Another option is the Caterham S-style seats. They might be pricey new, but they do come up for sale occasionally when someone is upgrading to Tillets. Of course, finding a pair might take a while. -John
  18. Did a search on BlatChat and came up with this interesting thread. -John
  19. Someone in the UK weighed a ready-to-install Duratec with most of the standard mods at 262 lb. (see breakdown below). A Type-9 weighs 70lb and I weighed my Raceline bellhousing at 8.4 lb. Add another couple of pounds for the clutch master cylinder, and a ready to install Duratec/Type-9 combo is roughly 342lb. A Duratec running the very common Denso lightweight alternator (-5.5lb) and the later plastic valve cover (-2.2) would come in at ~334lb. Duratec engine (c/w steel flywheel) 94.07kg AP Clutch friction plate 1.159kg AP Clutch cover plate 4.369kg Starter motor (c/w solenoid) 3.118kg Oil Filter 0.721kg Throttle Body (cyl. 1 & 2) 1.125kg Throttle Body (cyl. 3 & 4) 1.064kg Brkt T.Body/accel cable mounting 0.111kg N/Side engine mount 1.057kg 4No. Bolts for above mount 0.056kg O/Side engine Mount (c/w rubber) 1.458kg Fuel rail c/w 4 injectors 0.921kg N/Side top fan belt mount/idle pulley 0.392kg Oil pressure switch & sender set up 0.256kg Idle Pulley 0.385kg Idle Pulley & Alternator tension brkt 0.512kg Alternator mounting brkt 0.305kg Alternator (Standard Ford) 5.10kg Raceline water rail, t.stat & housing 1.615kg Coil Pack & 4 plug leads 1.00kg 8 x exhaust studs & nuts 0.27kg (total for 8) Engine Total (ready to install inc. mounts) 119.064 kG -John
  20. Thanks Al, that’s good to hear. Logically I know that the seat should be more than strong enough to withstand that type of abuse, but the illogical side of me keeps thinking “replacement seats cost HOW MUCH??” I remember when the Pound was less than a $1.60 Kyle, send me a PM if you want to see if we can arrange a time to meet. -John
  21. Kyle, I live in Sammamish which is about 20-25 miles east of downtown Seattle. I don’t know my Thanksgiving weekend schedule yet, but you are welcome to do a trial fit in my Westfield if we can find a time that works for both of us. One caveat though: given your comment that you don’t fit in the Solstice or S2000 due to width, you may not fit in my car. I have Mog seats which are pretty narrow and unforgiving with respect to fit. Although there is some flex in the carbon fiber sides, I wouldn’t want to find out the hard way that they can crack. :shocked: http://www.fluke-motorsport.co.uk/newImages/85_1.jpg -John
  22. And here is another shot of Buzz’s car front and center for the USA2005 group photo (taken by David Daniels). I convinced Buzz to post here, so hopefully someone in the greater Cincinnati area will jump in. BTW Mazda, you’d like Buzz. He has a ~300hp V8 in his car http://home.comcast.net/~cobar/webphotos/USA2005-GP.jpg -John
  23. I’ll second Al’s recommendation for a half hood. I’ve used my full hood once: the 14 hour drive home after the initial purchase. I didn’t care for it. Ingress/egress was a pain, it was like driving inside a drum, and the windscreen kept fogging up. When I rebuilt the car, I didn’t provision the hood and instead had a half hood made locally. A properly designed half hood will keep you nearly as dry as a full hood, but without all the associated shortcomings. They also weigh less -John
  24. The Westfield stock rollbar is even more of a joke than the Caterham item. Although the tubing is much beefier, there is no bracing – just a single, unsupported hoop. Works great as a push bar. It was about the same price to have a local shop make a proper rollbar to my specs than it was to buy the RAC rollbar from Westfield and ship it over. Gotta love the strong dollar and low fuel prices I agree that an FIA/RAC/SCCA spec rollbar is a must have. The thought of rolling my Westfield is horrifying, but using my head to support the weight of the car is even worse... -John
  25. When I took the Westfield to work last week, it was 28 for the morning commute. No heater or sidescreens, but I do have a windshield. Based on several other drives I have done with temps in the mid 30's, I discovered that my cold-weather gloves don't like breaking that 30 degree barrier. I couldn't feel my finger tips for the first couple of hours after arriving at the office For me, the biggest problem with cold weather driving is the lack of grip. It’s easy enough to stay warm if you dress properly (note to self: buy new winter driving gloves), but tires don’t seem to like temps below 50. I find that trying to accelerate hard in those conditions just results in a lot of wheel spin. Not that there is anything wrong with that… -John
×
×
  • Create New...