JohnCh

That's the normal fix, but it didn't work for me using the Windows native photo tool. I then tried it using Paint and it seems to work fine (Murphy's Law says it will be upside down when I click Submit Reply) -John

@mdork that's great news! Make sure you do a build thread. It's a great way to get input from those who have been there/done that. -John

First photo shows one of the (many) blind crests I mentioned in my earlier post. Very pretty, very fun road. -John

Did my first proper blat of the year this morning with @Pokey. It's unseasonably warm in the Seattle area this weekend, hitting 80F yesterday with today's expected high just a little cooler. We opted for an early start to avoid the crowds, leaving my house around 7:45 when temps were still in the mid 40s, and returned a couple of hours later to temps 20F higher. Perfect weather and shockingly, almost no traffic. Not even bicycles. If you live on Seattle's Eastside, I highly recommend Ben Howard Rd, which runs along the South side of State Route 2 between Monroe and Gold Bar. Great set of undulating twisties that dead end after ~15 miles, forcing you to pull a U-turn and do it all over again. Life is hard. The only down side is the number of blind crests. As you approach, you have no idea what's on the other side: Straight? Gentle corner? Hair pin? Left? Right? Chipmunk (just missed one of those on the return leg)? Consequently you frequently find yourself lifting or feathering the brake pedal as you approach only to find you could have maintained speed. Frustrating, but not slowing and getting it wrong is obviously not an option. And if that's the only negative about the road... Unfortunately no photos, but I'm still grinning! -John

This one is also listed on the forum here:

Closing this thread since someone started a thread on this topic earlier today:

Beautiful Europa and Elan. Snipping out relevant parts of the above; To reduce production costs compared to the S3, the S4 used a simplified chassis with sections of folded steel and welded steel side panels to regain some rigidity. As I recall, the fiberglass body is also stressed to help in that area. That type of chassis construction is not as elegant as a real Caterham, real Birkin, real Westfield, real Brunton, etc, but it reportedly still works well. The folded steel sections are similar to the Elan construction, so as with that car, it's important to check the relevant areas for rust. It sounds like an interesting project, and with few exceptions, any se7en is a huge amount of fun. Ignoring the state of that particular car, you'll be hard pressed to find anyone here who would talk you out of buying a se7en. We're what you call...enablers. -John

Interesting air filter setup on that car. I suppose under-bonnet space is at a premium, but river fording is definitely out. -John

Caterham SV with a turbo Zetec has landed on BaT: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/2004-caterham-7-2/

Crossflows may not win the HP wars, but they make more than enough to be fun, and to my ears, no other 4-cylinder option sounds better. There are a number of folks here who own or have owned DCOE-fed crossflows, so if you run into challenges sorting out any issues, don't hesitate to start a thread in the General Tech section for input. -John

Congrats, it's a nice looking car! What is the engine spec? -John

I discovered an unfortunate feature today in the new forum software. If someone is a thread starter and they delete their initial post, they have the unintended consequence of deleting the entire thread. This means they are deleting other people's posts in addition to their own. Although I don't have a problem with someone deleting their own content, I'm not ok with people deleting the content of others. To prevent this from occurring again, I have disabled the ability to delete your posts, however, you can edit them within 24 hours of posting and remove what you wrote. This effectively achieves the same outcome, but if it isn't sufficient for a specific post, please open a Support Request for further assistance. I have updated the FAQ with this information. -John

@kayentaskier you aren't losing your mind. It was there earlier. Might have been a proactive deletion by the thread starter to avoid the spanking Croc mentioned. -John

Wow, that should be fun! What is the suggested redline with that crank? Also, what drove the reconfiguration of the cam drive? I know the stock hydraulic chain tensioner raises concerns in some circles, but I've never heard of anyone moving to belts before. Thanks, John

I'm sure most of you are familiar with Griot's Garage. If not, they produce their own line of liquid car care products here in the US. To support USA7s, they are providing our Paid Club Members with a 15% discount on their liquid car-care product purchases over the next year (expires March 31, 2022.) More details are available here on the Club Matters forum (note: that forum is only visible to Paid Club Members.) -John

Closing this since it's a duplicate thread. Initial thread with replies already in place is here: -John

I've seen funky behavior before that only occurred with the headlights on. It turned out to be a loose ground on one of the tail lights. Given the PO changed the tail lights, I'd start there and make sure the grounds are very secure. -John

I confirmed there is no intake leak. I also spoke with Byron at VRM. He had thought about it over the weekend and had come to the same conclusion as someone else regarding exhaust pulses pulling in fresh air, artificially leaning the readings. As he put it, the engine was just running to well for those numbers to make sense. I'll find time over the next couple of weeks to bring the car back so they can install a WBO2 bung in the exhaust in preparation for another try. If the results are still really lean, then I know I have a bigger problem, likely with the carbs, to diagnose. Thanks, John

It has an RD Enterprises header and a cone filter replacing the stock filter at the end of the factory cold air setup. I can't see either of these making much difference. @Pokeythe reason this is confusing is that absent of other information, a needle change seems like the answer. However, other than the header, it's a stock UK-spec engine running the stock UK-spec needle. Although that may not be perfect, I wouldn't expect it to be in the 15:1-16:1 range. It might turn out to be a lot of little things are out of whack and adding up to the lean reading. -John

There is a short description of how they work starting at the bottom of page 4 of this PDF with a diagram on page 5. @fastg, that was me. Other than the header, this is supposed to be a stock non-Federal '68 Twin Cam, and the needle is the stock size for that configuration. It seems there are a few possibilities: The AFR data was wrong -- it's possible that reversion was creating artificially lean reading with the WBO2 probe up the tailpipe. Other than a plug cut, I don't know a simple way to confirm this, although I will speak to VRM tomorrow to ask the question. I suspect most of their tuning is done with a sensor screwed into an exhaust port rather than a tailpipe probe. The engine isn't stock -- the hp rating was consistent with what I'd expect from a stock engine, as were the rpms for peak hp and torque, so this is doubtful. There is something else affecting the AFR that mimic what you'd see if the needle was too lean. If this is the answer, I think it's more likely an issue with how the carbs were rebuilt. -John

Looking through receipts, I found a 3.5 hour line item to rebuild the carbs, but I can't find a receipt for a rebuild kit or any parts. Also, there was indication from the records that the carbs were converted to adjustable needles. Discovering that after buying the car was a surprise. I have no idea when that was done. Was it performed as part of the rebuild, or was it done at another time in the car's life? I didn't get a chance to do a plug cut yesterday, but will do that next week as the next step. I would like some confirmation that the AFR readings were true before I start tearing things apart. Thanks, John

Thanks guys. I found an article where someone experimented with needle height and an AFR gauge. The results supported that the effect at higher rpm was effectively zero. The AFR results on the dyno supported this. I'll research this more. The PO had a shop rebuild the carbs less than a year before I bought it and the thermal actuator is disabled. Of course this doesn't mean they rebuilt them correctly. I'll look through the receipts to see if it lists the replacement parts. The reason I'm not sold on a fuel flow issue is the shape of the AFR curve. Maybe I'm not thinking this through clearly, but if fuel flow was impeded, wouldn't that issue grow larger as fuel demands increased, rather than remain pretty steady? Other than a few random dips, the AFR vacillated from 15:1 to 16:1 from 3400rpm to 6500rpm (graph above was from a run that stopped before 5500rpm, but the initial run showed AFR remained steady to redline.) I would expect it to grow increasingly lean as the revs nearly double if fuel flow was a problem. Thanks, John

No, it was a good catch and worth including in the FAQ. Thanks for asking the question. -John

My carbs were converted to the adjustable needles and we did adjust height today between runs. That richened the low end, but made no change to the top half of the rpm scale. Based on what I've read, this is expected behavior for Strombergs. The needle height affects the low end, but higher rpm is governed by the needle profile. In hindsight, I wish we had pulled the plugs after a run to confirm lean condition, but at the time, the easy assumption was that the needles were too lean and the readings were correct. I'll try to do a plug check after a hard run this weekend. Thanks, John

After hearing I also had a Westfield, they said something about me not being worthy of viewing the big boys' room. Yes, that's Byron. He mentioned your dash is made from crumbly bits. My condolences. -John