Jump to content

JohnCh

Administrators
  • Posts

    3,338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JohnCh

  1. PM me your email address and I'll send you a word doc from the factory with the official settings for the Megabusa (even includes ARB positioning and shock settings). I find their recommended settings for street driven, touring oriented models are pretty conservative, but they're much closer for the track models (although camber is still understated a bit -- I'd treat the factory recommended camber settings as minimums.) Make sure your rake is set properly, as Westfields are very sensitive in this area. Don't worry about the actual ride height, which is dependant on tire size, but make sure the front to rear delta is correct (follow this link for proper measuring points.) The key is ensuring the imaginary lines between the front lower control arms' inner and outer pivot points are parallel to the ground. Adjust rear ride height from there. Also, check out the WSCC forum. There aren't a lot of Westfield owners in the US and even fewer with Megabusas, but it's a very different story in the UK. -John
  2. There are several things I like about Emerald. Support from the company and community is great. It's a very popular ECU for se7ens in the UK, so there are a lot of people on WSCC and BlatChat who have been there, done that and are always happy to help. Dave Walker, one of the owners, has an outstanding reputation in the UK as a tuner. He's written a great book on the subject, and the company has tuned a very large number of cars on their chassis dyno, so getting a starter map for a car with you specific configuration is generally not that hard. And lastly, in addition to the self mapping feature built into the unit, Chris Good put together a great little program that enables you to get the fuel map dialed in very quickly (it also works with MegaSquirt). The hardest parts of the map to set up are timing and the myriad of adjustments that impact drivablity at various temperatures. The nice thing about having a starter map from an engine that is a similar spec (asuming of course it was done by a talented tuner) is that those items are really close. Usually the fueling table will require a fair amount of fiddling, but that's pretty easy with the self mapping feature and Chris Good's software. Also, unlike DCOEs where you need to invest in a wide selection of expensive jets and emulsion tubes, making tweaks to the map yourself is free. If you really screwed things up, you just install an earlier version of your map and you are back where you started. -John
  3. I'd go this route. Emerald has likely done the conversion on a crossflow so will likely have a starter map and may even be able to get you some specific parts like a pre-fabbed crank trigger wheel/crank pulley and crank sensor bracket. Definitely worth an email. -John
  4. But we're better than the smooth brick! :party: The numbers above make the original Lotus Elite all the more remarkable: 0.29 in the late '50s. -John
  5. You mean embarrassing for Kenworth, right? -John
  6. The rare fiberglass body certainly helps with the latte...er, latter (curse you PNW auto correct!) -John
  7. I don't think 0-60 times would be an issue with a BDA. Affordability though is a slightly different story -John
  8. I agree with Kitcat. I've had a 1700 Crossflow and now a 2.0L Duratec. They are both great engines, but serve slightly different purposes. If your primary interest in a se7en is for the undiluted driving experience, and you aren't that worried about ultimate performance, then the Crossflow is a great choice. It oozes character, is powerful enough to get a se7en to 60mph in 6 seconds or less, and sounds fantastic at any throttle opening or rpm. If, however, ultimate performance is more important to you and the idea of blistering acceleration is a key consideration, then you are probably better served with a more modern powerplant. You'll get a lot more power, better touring range and drivability, and you'll still have character -- just not quite as much. -John
  9. Love the pic arriving in Moab. Agree that USA2005 really was a very special time - from the roads to the scenery to the people. Hope rumors of a 10 year reunion tour are true. -John
  10. Hmm... http://www.throttle-steer.com/uploads/1/1/0/8/11083275/8024029_orig.jpg -John
  11. Ooh, if it's that Mike, I had the pleasure of seeing and hearing his beast on USA2005. And if it's not that Mike, well...welcome anyway! :-) -John
  12. I guess both congratulations and condolences are in order. Where is the car's new home? -John
  13. That is great news! Was it found in the Greenlake area as per the tip on Pelican? -John
  14. I replaced my Bell M3 with an HJC AR10 II. The rear section of the shell doesn't protrude as far back as the Bell, so it's a lot more comfortable when sitting in a one-piece seat. -John
  15. I'm in the process of putting the Westfield back together, but if it's running, then I'll be there. -John
  16. Looks great. Do you have a dyno graph you can share? Thanks, John
  17. I've posted to the PNW 6speedonline forum and also the PNW 993 owners group. I've had a car stolen before so can empathize. Hopefully this ends well. -John
  18. JohnCh

    Images

    They are two different things. SkyDrive is for cloud storage and using Office Web Apps. Windows Live Photo Gallery is a photo editing/organization tool. You can use the latter to resize your photos and SkyDrive to share them with others via the web -John
  19. I've never removed just the driveshaft, but going from memory, the chassis tubing that gets in the way only overlaps the rear of the driveshaft by a couple of inches. If that’s the case, one option is to move the engine and transmission assembly forward by the same amount to give the needed clearance. I’ve taken a similar approach to remove the sump, which on my car requires separating the bell housing from the block. It was definitely much easier and faster than pulling the engine out of the car. Might be worth a look to see if that would work here. -John
  20. Looks like a fun trip with virtually no overlap with our route. An exception, and where I suggest you consider making an alteration, is from Fort Bragg to Santa Cruz. Pierats turned us on to some outstanding (really, really outstanding) roads between Santa Cruz and CA-35, that avoid Hwy 17: http://binged.it/KezGch -John
  21. I suppose convincing the school district to delay the start of school by a week is out of the question? :jester: Let me know if you want the route we're taking. I have it in Streets & Trips and can export it as a .gpx file. -John
  22. Gert, any chance we can convince you to reverse your itinerary and join us for a couple of days in NorCal after the races? Pierats is also thinking about coming along for part of that trip, so we'd have about half the group from PNW2007. -John
  23. I seem to recall you have one of the Yarwood-era cars. If he did the engine, and if no subsequent owners made changes, then you probably have a Kent 234 cam, 9.8:1 pistons, and little to no headwork. He claimed that in this configuration it put out 145hp, but 120hp is closer to reality based on the spec and my own personal experience on the dyno. It's enough to get the car to 60mph in 6.1 seconds according to Road & Track and is extremely docile, even in traffic -- very nice little engine. -John
  24. In its first life, my Westfield had a crossflow with DCOEs. As others have already written, keep them! I never had an issue with drivability and they sounded bloody fantastic. What spec is the engine? -John
  25. Giving this a bump for those who have been considering joining up for the tour portion of the trip. Some of the hotels book up really early for August, so if you think you may join for any of the legs, please PM me for details. It’s best to make your reservations now to cover your bases and then cancel them later if you decide not to go. Thanks, John
×
×
  • Create New...