JohnCh Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago He has a problematic Zetec that is getting horrid mileage. Someone with a 420 should be able to chime in with their typical street mpg. As proxies, my Westfield, with a taller (3.62 vs. 3.92) final drive returned ~25 mpg when it had 420 cams with ITBs, and about 1-2mpg worse after changing to more aggressive cams. Highway consumption when touring was much better. The 2.4L Duratec in my Caterham is pretty thirsty, barely breaking 20 mpg in normal (back roads/around town) street use. Something would need to be wrong for you to go through 5 gallons in just 40 miles of street use in a stock 420.
KnifeySpoony Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago My 420R with roller barrels (and Caterham tune) gets crap mileage. 70mph cruise doesn't even get 20mpg. I think around 15-18. Always been that way. That's with aeroscreen, no doors, sticky tires.
hahuang65 Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago 43 minutes ago, JohnCh said: Something would need to be wrong for you to go through 5 gallons in just 40 miles of street use in a stock 420. That's the only real thing I'm worried about. 5 gallon tank, no real problems there if somehow that were true. I'm used to getting 15mpg in my STI so no issues there either lol. That being said, pretty sure my friend was plowing at 100+ mph for a good portion of that 40 mile drive, maybe even half of it lol
wdb Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 8 MPG? You may want to pull the dipstick and sniff for gas smell. 1
KnifeySpoony Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago These cars have terrible aero. At over 100mph, mpg could drop pretty far...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now